chore: resolve lint errors

[Om-A-osc]

---

type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:

• task: lint_filenames
  status: passed
• task: lint_editorconfig
  status: passed
• task: lint_markdown
  status: na
• task: lint_package_json
  status: na
• task: lint_repl_help
  status: na
• task: lint_javascript_src
  status: na
• task: lint_javascript_cli
  status: na
• task: lint_javascript_examples
  status: na
• task: lint_javascript_tests
  status: na
• task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
  status: passed
• task: lint_python
  status: na
• task: lint_r
  status: na
• task: lint_c_src
  status: na
• task: lint_c_examples
  status: na
• task: lint_c_benchmarks
  status: na
• task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
  status: na
• task: lint_shell
  status: na
• task: lint_typescript_declarations
  status: passed
• task: lint_typescript_tests
  status: na
• task: lint_license_headers
  status: passed

---

Resolves #9851.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request fixes JavaScript benchmark linting errors in the
@stdlib/utils/async/inmap package by:

• Replacing disallowed new Array() constructions with array literals and push, as required by the stdlib/no-new-array rule.
• Updating benchmark description strings to use @stdlib/string/format instead of string concatenation, resolving stdlib/no-bench-string-concat warnings.

These changes ensure that the affected benchmark files conform to stdlib linting and style guidelines.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

• Fix JavaScript lint errors #9851

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
utils/async/inmap	$\color{green}544/544$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}62/62$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}9/9$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}544/544$ $\color{green}+0.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[GeoDaoyu]

Copyright info

[kgryte]

LGTM