Skip to content

chore: fix JavaScript lint errors (issue #10801)#10802

Closed
parthodas23 wants to merge 2 commits intostdlib-js:developfrom
parthodas23:fix/js-lint-errors-10801
Closed

chore: fix JavaScript lint errors (issue #10801)#10802
parthodas23 wants to merge 2 commits intostdlib-js:developfrom
parthodas23:fix/js-lint-errors-10801

Conversation

@parthodas23
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Resolves #10801

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • Replaced a tab character with a space in the JSDoc comment (license URL line) to comply with internal linting standards.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

  • Yes
  • No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

  • Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
  • Test/benchmark generation
  • Documentation (including examples)
  • Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

{{TODO: add disclosure if applicable}}


@stdlib-js/reviewers

Signed-off-by: Partha Das <parthodasm@gmail.com>
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. labels Mar 8, 2026
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Mar 8, 2026

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
array/base/cusome-by-right $\color{green}313/313$
$\color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{green}18/18$
$\color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{green}4/4$
$\color{green}+100.00%$
$\color{green}313/313$
$\color{green}+100.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

Signed-off-by: Partha Das <parthodasm@gmail.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@GeoDaoyu GeoDaoyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@parthodas23
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

That’s true, I saw that. But the error shows on line 13, and line 13 seems correct. Could you tell me what the reason is and how I can fix it?

image

@GeoDaoyu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

GeoDaoyu commented Mar 8, 2026

I don’t know why, I mentioned in #10804

@kgryte
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

kgryte commented Mar 9, 2026

Ref: #10804

@kgryte kgryte added autoclose: Already Resolved Pull request which should be auto-closed due proposed changes duplicating already included changes. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Mar 9, 2026
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for working on this pull request. However, we cannot accept your contribution as the issue this pull request seeks to resolve has already been addressed in a different pull request or commit.

Thank you again for your interest in stdlib, and we look forward to reviewing your future contributions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

autoclose: Already Resolved Pull request which should be auto-closed due proposed changes duplicating already included changes. Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix JavaScript lint errors

4 participants