bench: refactor to use string interpolation in blas/ext/base/dapx

[rautelaKamal]

Ref #8647.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• Refactors the JavaScript benchmarks in @stdlib/blas/ext/base/dapx to use string interpolation via @stdlib/string/format instead of string concatenation for constructing benchmark names.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

• [RFC]: use string interpolation in JavaScript benchmarks for the benchmark name (tracking issue) #8647

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
blas/ext/base/dapx	$\color{green}388/388$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}26/26$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}4/4$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}388/388$ $\color{green}+100.00%$
stats/base/dists/erlang/pdf	$\color{green}198/198$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}9/9$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}198/198$ $\color{green}+100.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[kgryte]

This PR contains unrelated changes. Please follow our dev guide and be sure you are branching from develop.