chore(github): update issue templates and add PR template#436
chore(github): update issue templates and add PR template#436nanotaboada merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
WalkthroughGitHub repository workflow configuration updated across five files: issue templates modified to remove preset titles and restructure sections, issue creation disabled for blank submissions, Copilot instructions extended with Spec-Driven Development guidelines and issue template specifications, and a new pull request template introduced with structured PR sections and checklist items. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|



Summary
feature_request.mdandbug_report.md: removed forced bracket prefixes from titles, relying on labels (enhancement,bug) for categorization insteadbug_report.mdacross repos (go,python,typescriptwere missing)Suggested Approachoptional infeature_request.md; replaced generic criteria placeholders with meaningful defaultsconfig.ymlto disable blank issues (enforces template usage)pull_request_template.mdwith type-of-change checklist aligned to Conventional Commits types### Creating Issuessection tocopilot-instructions.mddocumenting the SDD workflow (Plan → Issue → implement) and the expected structure for both template typesTest plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Chores