This directory contains Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) for this project. ADRs document significant architectural decisions — what was decided, why, and what trade-offs were accepted.
| ADR | Title | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 0001 | Adopt Traditional Layered Architecture | Accepted (Under Reconsideration) |
| 0002 | Use MVC Controllers over Minimal API | Accepted |
| 0003 | Use SQLite for Data Storage | Accepted |
| 0004 | Use UUID as Database Primary Key | Accepted |
| 0005 | Use Squad Number as API Mutation Key | Accepted |
| 0006 | Use RFC 7807 Problem Details for Errors | Accepted |
| 0007 | Use FluentValidation over Data Annotations | Accepted |
| 0008 | Use AutoMapper for DTO Mapping | Accepted |
| 0009 | Implement In-Memory Caching | Accepted |
| 0010 | Use Serilog for Structured Logging | Accepted |
| 0011 | Use Docker for Containerization | Accepted |
| 0012 | Use Stadium-Themed Semantic Versioning | Accepted |
| 0013 | Testing Strategy | Accepted |
Create an ADR when a decision affects:
- Project structure or overall architecture
- Technology choices or dependencies
- API contracts or data model design
- Non-functional requirements (performance, security, scalability)
- Development workflows or processes
# [NUMBER]. [TITLE]
Date: YYYY-MM-DD
## Status
[Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded by ADR-XXXX]
## Context
What is the issue we are facing? What forces are at play (technical, political,
social, project constraints)? Present facts neutrally without bias.
## Decision
We will [DECISION IN ACTIVE VOICE WITH FULL SENTENCES].
## Consequences
### Positive
- Consequence 1
### Negative
- Trade-off 1
### Neutral
- Other effect 1