|
| 1 | +{ |
| 2 | + "cells": [ |
| 3 | + { |
| 4 | + "cell_type": "markdown", |
| 5 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 6 | + "source": [ |
| 7 | + "# Randomized Benchmarking Overview\n", |
| 8 | + "\n", |
| 9 | + "### Contributors\n", |
| 10 | + "\n", |
| 11 | + "Shelly Garion$^{1}$, Yael Ben-Haim$^{2}$ and David McKay$^{2}$\n", |
| 12 | + "\n", |
| 13 | + "1. IBM Research Haifa, Haifa University Campus, Mount Carmel Haifa, Israel\n", |
| 14 | + "2. IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA\n", |
| 15 | + "\n", |
| 16 | + "### References\n", |
| 17 | + "\n", |
| 18 | + "1. Easwar Magesan, J. M. Gambetta, and Joseph Emerson, Robust randomized benchmarking of quantum processes,\n", |
| 19 | + "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1009.3639\n", |
| 20 | + "\n", |
| 21 | + "2. Easwar Magesan,, Jay M. Gambetta, and Joseph Emerson, Characterizing Quantum Gates via Randomized Benchmarking,\n", |
| 22 | + "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1109.6887\n", |
| 23 | + "\n", |
| 24 | + "3. A. D. C'orcoles, Jay M. Gambetta, Jerry M. Chow, John A. Smolin, Matthew Ware, J. D. Strand, B. L. T. Plourde, and M. Steffen, Supplementary material for ''Process verification of two-qubit quantum gates by randomized benchmarking'', https://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.7011\n", |
| 25 | + "\n", |
| 26 | + "4. Jay M. Gambetta, A. D. C´orcoles, S. T. Merkel, B. R. Johnson, John A. Smolin, Jerry M. Chow,\n", |
| 27 | + "Colm A. Ryan, Chad Rigetti, S. Poletto, Thomas A. Ohki, Mark B. Ketchen, and M. Steffen,\n", |
| 28 | + "Characterization of addressability by simultaneous randomized benchmarking, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.6308\n", |
| 29 | + "\n", |
| 30 | + "5. David C. McKay, Sarah Sheldon, John A. Smolin, Jerry M. Chow, and Jay M. Gambetta, Three Qubit Randomized Benchmarking,\n", |
| 31 | + "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.06550" |
| 32 | + ] |
| 33 | + }, |
| 34 | + { |
| 35 | + "cell_type": "markdown", |
| 36 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 37 | + "source": [ |
| 38 | + "## Intorduction\n", |
| 39 | + "\n", |
| 40 | + "One of the main challenges in building a quantum information processor is the non-scalability of completely\n", |
| 41 | + "characterizing the noise affecting a quantum system via process tomography. In addition, process tomography is sensitive to noise in the pre- and post rotation gates plus the measurements (SPAM errors). Gateset tomography can take these errors into account, but the scaling is even worse. A complete characterization\n", |
| 42 | + "of the noise is useful because it allows for the determination of good error-correction schemes, and thus\n", |
| 43 | + "the possibility of reliable transmission of quantum information.\n", |
| 44 | + "\n", |
| 45 | + "Since complete process tomography is infeasible for large systems, there is growing interest in scalable\n", |
| 46 | + "methods for partially characterizing the noise affecting a quantum system. A scalable (in the number $n$ of qubits comprising the system) and robust algorithm for benchmarking the full set of Clifford gates by a single parameter using randomization techniques was presented in [1]. The concept of using randomization methods for benchmarking quantum gates is commonly called **Randomized Benchmarking\n", |
| 47 | + "(RB)**." |
| 48 | + ] |
| 49 | + }, |
| 50 | + { |
| 51 | + "cell_type": "markdown", |
| 52 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 53 | + "source": [ |
| 54 | + "## The Randomized Benchmarking Protocol\n", |
| 55 | + "\n", |
| 56 | + "A RB protocol consists of the following steps:\n", |
| 57 | + "\n", |
| 58 | + "(We should first import the relevant qiskit classes for the demonstration)." |
| 59 | + ] |
| 60 | + }, |
| 61 | + { |
| 62 | + "cell_type": "code", |
| 63 | + "execution_count": 5, |
| 64 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 65 | + "outputs": [], |
| 66 | + "source": [ |
| 67 | + "#Import general libraries (needed for functions)\n", |
| 68 | + "import numpy as np\n", |
| 69 | + "import matplotlib.pyplot as plt\n", |
| 70 | + "from IPython import display\n", |
| 71 | + "\n", |
| 72 | + "#Import Qiskit classes classes\n", |
| 73 | + "import qiskit\n", |
| 74 | + "from qiskit.providers.aer.noise import NoiseModel\n", |
| 75 | + "from qiskit.providers.aer.noise.errors.standard_errors import depolarizing_error, thermal_relaxation_error\n", |
| 76 | + "\n", |
| 77 | + "#Import the RB Functions\n", |
| 78 | + "import qiskit.ignis.verification.randomized_benchmarking as rb" |
| 79 | + ] |
| 80 | + }, |
| 81 | + { |
| 82 | + "cell_type": "markdown", |
| 83 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 84 | + "source": [ |
| 85 | + "### Step 1: Generate RB sequences\n", |
| 86 | + "\n", |
| 87 | + "The RB sequences consist of random Clifford elements chosen uniformly from the Clifford group on $n$-qubits, \n", |
| 88 | + "including a computed reversal element,\n", |
| 89 | + "that should return the qubits to the initial state.\n", |
| 90 | + "\n", |
| 91 | + "More precisely, for each length $m$, we choose $K_m$ RB sequences. \n", |
| 92 | + "Each such sequence contains $m$ random elements $C_{i_j}$ chosen uniformly from the Clifford group on $n$-qubits, and the $m+1$ element is defined as follows: $C_{i_{m+1}} = (C_{i_1}\\cdot ... \\cdot C_{i_m})^{-1}$.\n", |
| 93 | + "\n", |
| 94 | + "For example, we generate below several sequences of 2-qubit Clifford circuits." |
| 95 | + ] |
| 96 | + }, |
| 97 | + { |
| 98 | + "cell_type": "code", |
| 99 | + "execution_count": 9, |
| 100 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 101 | + "outputs": [], |
| 102 | + "source": [ |
| 103 | + "#Generate RB circuits (2Q RB)\n", |
| 104 | + "\n", |
| 105 | + "#number of qubits\n", |
| 106 | + "nQ=2 \n", |
| 107 | + "rb_opts = {}\n", |
| 108 | + "#Number of Cliffords in the sequence\n", |
| 109 | + "rb_opts['length_vector'] = [1, 10, 20, 50, 75, 100, 125]\n", |
| 110 | + "#Number of seeds (random sequences)\n", |
| 111 | + "rb_opts['nseeds'] = 5 \n", |
| 112 | + "#Default pattern\n", |
| 113 | + "rb_opts['rb_pattern'] = [[0,1]]\n", |
| 114 | + "\n", |
| 115 | + "rb_circs, xdata = rb.randomized_benchmarking_seq(**rb_opts)" |
| 116 | + ] |
| 117 | + }, |
| 118 | + { |
| 119 | + "cell_type": "markdown", |
| 120 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 121 | + "source": [ |
| 122 | + "As an example, we print the circuit corresponding to the first RB sequence" |
| 123 | + ] |
| 124 | + }, |
| 125 | + { |
| 126 | + "cell_type": "code", |
| 127 | + "execution_count": 11, |
| 128 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 129 | + "outputs": [ |
| 130 | + { |
| 131 | + "name": "stdout", |
| 132 | + "output_type": "stream", |
| 133 | + "text": [ |
| 134 | + " ┌───┐┌─────┐┌───┐ ┌───┐┌───┐┌───┐ ░ ┌───┐┌─────┐»\n", |
| 135 | + "qr_0: |0>┤ H ├┤ Sdg ├┤ H ├──■───────────────────┤ H ├┤ S ├┤ X ├─░─┤ X ├┤ Sdg ├»\n", |
| 136 | + " └───┘└─────┘└───┘┌─┴─┐┌─────┐┌───┐┌───┐└───┘└───┘└───┘ ░ └───┘└─────┘»\n", |
| 137 | + "qr_1: |0>─────────────────┤ X ├┤ Sdg ├┤ H ├┤ X ├────────────────░─────────────»\n", |
| 138 | + " └───┘└─────┘└───┘└───┘ ░ »\n", |
| 139 | + " cr_0: 0 ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════»\n", |
| 140 | + " »\n", |
| 141 | + " cr_1: 0 ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════»\n", |
| 142 | + " »\n", |
| 143 | + "« ┌───┐ ┌───┐┌───┐┌───┐┌─┐\n", |
| 144 | + "«qr_0: ┤ H ├─────────────────■─────┤ H ├┤ S ├┤ H ├┤M├\n", |
| 145 | + "« └───┘┌───┐┌───┐┌───┐┌─┴─┐┌─┐└───┘└───┘└───┘└╥┘\n", |
| 146 | + "«qr_1: ─────┤ X ├┤ H ├┤ S ├┤ X ├┤M├────────────────╫─\n", |
| 147 | + "« └───┘└───┘└───┘└───┘└╥┘ ║ \n", |
| 148 | + "«cr_0: ══════════════════════════╬═════════════════╩═\n", |
| 149 | + "« ║ \n", |
| 150 | + "«cr_1: ══════════════════════════╩═══════════════════\n", |
| 151 | + "« \n" |
| 152 | + ] |
| 153 | + } |
| 154 | + ], |
| 155 | + "source": [ |
| 156 | + "print(rb_circs[0][0])" |
| 157 | + ] |
| 158 | + }, |
| 159 | + { |
| 160 | + "cell_type": "markdown", |
| 161 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 162 | + "source": [ |
| 163 | + "One can verify that the Unitary representing each RB circuit should be the identity (with a global phase). \n", |
| 164 | + "We simulate this using Aer unitary simulator." |
| 165 | + ] |
| 166 | + }, |
| 167 | + { |
| 168 | + "cell_type": "code", |
| 169 | + "execution_count": 10, |
| 170 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 171 | + "outputs": [], |
| 172 | + "source": [ |
| 173 | + "#Create a new circuit without the measurement\n", |
| 174 | + "qc = qiskit.QuantumCircuit(*rb_circs[0][-1].qregs,*rb_circs[0][-1].cregs)\n", |
| 175 | + "for i in rb_circs[0][-1][0:-nQ]:\n", |
| 176 | + " qc._attach(i)" |
| 177 | + ] |
| 178 | + }, |
| 179 | + { |
| 180 | + "cell_type": "code", |
| 181 | + "execution_count": 12, |
| 182 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 183 | + "outputs": [], |
| 184 | + "source": [ |
| 185 | + "#Create a new circuit without the measurement\n", |
| 186 | + "qc = qiskit.QuantumCircuit(*rb_circs[0][-1].qregs,*rb_circs[0][-1].cregs)\n", |
| 187 | + "for i in rb_circs[0][-1][0:-nQ]:\n", |
| 188 | + " qc._attach(i)" |
| 189 | + ] |
| 190 | + }, |
| 191 | + { |
| 192 | + "cell_type": "code", |
| 193 | + "execution_count": 13, |
| 194 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 195 | + "outputs": [ |
| 196 | + { |
| 197 | + "name": "stdout", |
| 198 | + "output_type": "stream", |
| 199 | + "text": [ |
| 200 | + "[[-0.707-0.707j 0. +0.j 0. +0.j 0. +0.j ]\n", |
| 201 | + " [ 0. -0.j -0.707-0.707j -0. +0.j 0. +0.j ]\n", |
| 202 | + " [ 0. +0.j 0. +0.j -0.707-0.707j 0. +0.j ]\n", |
| 203 | + " [ 0. -0.j 0. +0.j 0. +0.j -0.707-0.707j]]\n" |
| 204 | + ] |
| 205 | + } |
| 206 | + ], |
| 207 | + "source": [ |
| 208 | + "#The Unitary is an identity (with a global phase)\n", |
| 209 | + "backend = qiskit.Aer.get_backend('unitary_simulator')\n", |
| 210 | + "basis_gates = ['u1','u2','u3','cx'] # use U,CX for now\n", |
| 211 | + "basis_gates_str = ','.join(basis_gates)\n", |
| 212 | + "job = qiskit.execute(qc, backend=backend, basis_gates=basis_gates_str)\n", |
| 213 | + "print(np.around(job.result().get_unitary(),3))" |
| 214 | + ] |
| 215 | + }, |
| 216 | + { |
| 217 | + "cell_type": "markdown", |
| 218 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 219 | + "source": [ |
| 220 | + "### Step 2: Execute the RB sequences (with some noise)\n", |
| 221 | + "\n", |
| 222 | + "We can execute the RB sequences either using Qiskit Aer Simulator (with some noise model) or using IBMQ provider, and obtain a list of results.\n", |
| 223 | + "\n", |
| 224 | + "By assumption each operation $C_{i_j}$ is allowed to have some error, represnted by $\\Lambda_{i_j,j}$, and each sequence can be modeled by the operation:\n", |
| 225 | + "$$\\textit{S}_{\\textbf{i}_\\textbf{m}} = \\bigcirc_{j=1}^{m+1} (\\Lambda_{i_j,j} \\circ C_{i_j})$$\n", |
| 226 | + "where ${\\textbf{i}_\\textbf{m}} = (i_1,...,i_m)$ and $i_{m+1}$ is uniquely determined by ${\\textbf{i}_\\textbf{m}}$." |
| 227 | + ] |
| 228 | + }, |
| 229 | + { |
| 230 | + "cell_type": "code", |
| 231 | + "execution_count": 14, |
| 232 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 233 | + "outputs": [], |
| 234 | + "source": [ |
| 235 | + "# Run on a noisy simulator\n", |
| 236 | + "noise_model = NoiseModel()\n", |
| 237 | + "noise_model.add_all_qubit_quantum_error(depolarizing_error(0.002, 1), ['u1', 'u2', 'u3'])\n", |
| 238 | + "noise_model.add_all_qubit_quantum_error(depolarizing_error(0.002, 2), 'cx')\n", |
| 239 | + "\n", |
| 240 | + "backend = qiskit.Aer.get_backend('qasm_simulator')\n", |
| 241 | + "basis_gates = 'u1,u2,u3,cx'\n", |
| 242 | + "result_list = []" |
| 243 | + ] |
| 244 | + }, |
| 245 | + { |
| 246 | + "cell_type": "markdown", |
| 247 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 248 | + "source": [ |
| 249 | + "### Step 3: Get statistics about the survival probabilities\n", |
| 250 | + "\n", |
| 251 | + "For each of the $K_m$ sequences the survival probability $Tr[E_\\psi \\textit{S}_{\\textbf{i}_\\textbf{m}}(\\rho_\\psi)]$\n", |
| 252 | + "is measured. \n", |
| 253 | + "Here $\\rho_\\psi$ is the initial state taking into account preparation errors and $E_\\psi$ is the\n", |
| 254 | + "POVM element that takes into account measurement errors.\n", |
| 255 | + "In the ideal (noise-free) case $\\rho_\\psi = E_\\psi = |\\psi \\rangle \\langle \\psi|$. \n", |
| 256 | + "\n", |
| 257 | + "In practice one can measure the probability to go back to the exact initial state, i.e. all the qubits in the ground state ($|00...0\\rangle$) or just the probability for one of the qubits to return back to the ground state. Measuring the qubits independently can be more convenient if a correlated measurement scheme is not possible. Both measurements will fit to the same decay parameter according to the properties of the twirl. " |
| 258 | + ] |
| 259 | + }, |
| 260 | + { |
| 261 | + "cell_type": "markdown", |
| 262 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 263 | + "source": [ |
| 264 | + "### Step 4: Find the averaged sequence fidelity\n", |
| 265 | + "\n", |
| 266 | + "Average over the $K_m$ random realizations to find the averaged sequence **fidelity**,\n", |
| 267 | + "$$F_{seq}(m,\\psi) = Tr[E_\\psi \\textit{S}_{K_m}(\\rho_\\psi)]$$\n", |
| 268 | + "where \n", |
| 269 | + "$$\\textit{S}_{K_m} = \\frac{1}{K_m} \\sum_{\\textbf{i}_\\textbf{m}} \\textit{S}_{\\textbf{i}_\\textbf{m}}$$" |
| 270 | + ] |
| 271 | + }, |
| 272 | + { |
| 273 | + "cell_type": "markdown", |
| 274 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 275 | + "source": [ |
| 276 | + "### Step 5: Fit the results\n", |
| 277 | + "\n", |
| 278 | + "Repeat Steps 1 through 4 for different values of $m$ and fit the\n", |
| 279 | + "Fit the results for the averaged sequence delity to the model:\n", |
| 280 | + "$$ \\textit{F}_g(m,|\\psi \\rangle ) = A_0 p^m +B_0$$\n", |
| 281 | + "where $A_0$ and $B_0$ absorb state preparation and measurement errors as well as an edge effect from the\n", |
| 282 | + "error on the final gate.\n", |
| 283 | + "\n", |
| 284 | + "$p$ determines the average error-rate $r$, which is also called **Error per Clifford (EPC)** \n", |
| 285 | + "according to the relation $$ r = 1-p-\\frac{1-p}{2^n} = \\frac{2^n-1}{2^n}(1-p)$$" |
| 286 | + ] |
| 287 | + }, |
| 288 | + { |
| 289 | + "cell_type": "code", |
| 290 | + "execution_count": 16, |
| 291 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 292 | + "outputs": [ |
| 293 | + { |
| 294 | + "name": "stdout", |
| 295 | + "output_type": "stream", |
| 296 | + "text": [ |
| 297 | + "After seed 0, EPC 0.011154\n", |
| 298 | + "After seed 1, EPC 0.011494\n", |
| 299 | + "After seed 2, EPC 0.010545\n", |
| 300 | + "After seed 3, EPC 0.011478\n", |
| 301 | + "After seed 4, EPC 0.011082\n" |
| 302 | + ] |
| 303 | + } |
| 304 | + ], |
| 305 | + "source": [ |
| 306 | + "#Create the RB fitter\n", |
| 307 | + "rb_fit = rb.RBFitter(None, xdata, rb_opts['rb_pattern'])\n", |
| 308 | + "for rb_seed,rb_circ_seed in enumerate(rb_circs):\n", |
| 309 | + " qobj = qiskit.compile(rb_circ_seed,\n", |
| 310 | + " backend=backend,\n", |
| 311 | + " basis_gates=basis_gates)\n", |
| 312 | + " job = backend.run(qobj, noise_model=noise_model)\n", |
| 313 | + "\n", |
| 314 | + " #add data to the fitter\n", |
| 315 | + " rb_fit.add_data(job.result())\n", |
| 316 | + " print('After seed %d, EPC %f'%(rb_seed,rb_fit.fit[0]['epc']))" |
| 317 | + ] |
| 318 | + }, |
| 319 | + { |
| 320 | + "cell_type": "code", |
| 321 | + "execution_count": null, |
| 322 | + "metadata": {}, |
| 323 | + "outputs": [], |
| 324 | + "source": [] |
| 325 | + } |
| 326 | + ], |
| 327 | + "metadata": { |
| 328 | + "kernelspec": { |
| 329 | + "display_name": "Python 3", |
| 330 | + "language": "python", |
| 331 | + "name": "python3" |
| 332 | + }, |
| 333 | + "language_info": { |
| 334 | + "codemirror_mode": { |
| 335 | + "name": "ipython", |
| 336 | + "version": 3 |
| 337 | + }, |
| 338 | + "file_extension": ".py", |
| 339 | + "mimetype": "text/x-python", |
| 340 | + "name": "python", |
| 341 | + "nbconvert_exporter": "python", |
| 342 | + "pygments_lexer": "ipython3", |
| 343 | + "version": "3.6.8" |
| 344 | + } |
| 345 | + }, |
| 346 | + "nbformat": 4, |
| 347 | + "nbformat_minor": 2 |
| 348 | +} |
0 commit comments