Fixed issue 987 by updating 1_getting_started_with_qiskit.ipynb notebook (#1009)

Co-authored-by: Paul Nation <nonhermitian@gmail.com>

Author: brunormzg

tutorials/circuits/1_getting_started_with_qiskit.ipynb

@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
     "<div class=\"alert alert-block alert-info\">\n",
     "\n",
     "\n",
-    "When representing the state of a multi-qubit system, the tensor order used in Qiskit is different than that used in most physics textbooks. Suppose there are $n$ qubits, and qubit $j$ is labeled as $Q_{j}$. Qiskit uses an ordering in which the $n^{\\mathrm{th}}$ qubit is on the <em><strong>left</strong></em> side of the tensor product, so that the basis vectors are labeled as  $Q_n\\otimes \\cdots  \\otimes  Q_1\\otimes Q_0$.\n",
+    "When representing the state of a multi-qubit system, the tensor order used in Qiskit is different than that used in most physics textbooks. Suppose there are $n$ qubits, and qubit $j$ is labeled as $Q_{j}$. Qiskit uses an ordering in which the $n^{\\mathrm{th}}$ qubit is on the <em><strong>left</strong></em> side of the tensor product, so that the basis vectors are labeled as  $Q_{n-1}\\otimes \\cdots  \\otimes  Q_1\\otimes Q_0$.\n",
     "\n",
     "For example, if qubit zero is in state 0, qubit 1 is in state 0, and qubit 2 is in state 1, Qiskit would represent this state as $|100\\rangle$, whereas many physics textbooks would represent it as $|001\\rangle$.\n",
     "\n",
@@ -631,7 +631,7 @@
    "name": "python",
    "nbconvert_exporter": "python",
    "pygments_lexer": "ipython3",
-   "version": "3.8.2"
+   "version": "3.7.3"
   },
   "varInspector": {
    "cols": {