You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: DEVELOPMENT.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ For each change in the specification we should _always_ consider the following:
38
38
- Tooling. Strive to support code generation, software interfaces, and spec generation techniques. Some features may be impossible to support in different frameworks/languages. These should be documented and considered during the change approval process.
39
39
- Visualization. Can the specification change be graphically visualized somehow in a UI or other interface?
40
40
41
-
Spec changes should be approved by a majority of the committers. Approval can be given by commenting on the issue itself, for example, "Approved by @fehguy". After voting criteria is met, any committer can merge the PR. (**TODO: we will want to formalize what voting criteria actually is).
41
+
Spec changes should be approved by a majority of the committers. Approval can be given by commenting on the issue itself, for example, "Approved by @fehguy". After voting criteria is met, any committer can merge the PR. (**TODO**: we will want to formalize what voting criteria actually is).
42
42
43
43
No change should be approved until there is documentation for it, supplied in an accompanying PR.
0 commit comments